Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Feeds
34738 items (30225 unread) in 5 feeds
OpenSource
(5767 unread)
-
SourceForge.net: Front page news
(802 unread)
-
Slashdot: IT (4965 unread)
Security
(11370 unread)
-
Digg / Security (11370 unread)
Linux
(13088 unread)
-
-
Slashdot: Linux (1661 unread)
Slashdot: IT
-
Why Warriors, Not Geeks, Run US Cyber Command Posts
Posted: September 25th, 2010, 8:26pm CEST by timothy
Tags: military
koterica writes "The Washington Post explains why the military prefers to have combat veterans rather than geeks running network security. '"It was supposed to be a war fighter unit, not a geek unit," said task force veteran Jason Healey, who had served as an Air Force signals intelligence officer. A fighter would understand, for instance, if an enemy had penetrated the networks and changed coordinates or target times, said Dusty Rhoads, a retired Air Force colonel and former F-117 pilot who recruited the original task force members. "A techie wouldn't have a clue," he said.'"